Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4309 13
Original file (NR4309 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 5. COURTHOUSE ROAD. SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 

HD
Docket No. NR4309-13

l
12 June 2014

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

—— re

REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD

Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl: (1) 2 DD Forms 149 dtd 7 Apr 13 each w/fattachments
(2) PERS-OO0J ltr dtd 24 Mar 14 ,
(3) PERS-832 memo dtd 11 Apr 14
(4) PERS-32 memo dtd 23 Apr 14

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this

Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be
corrected by removing documents 17002525 and 17002526 (copy at Tab
A), his administrative separation board case file including a no
further action message COMNAVPERSCOM MILLINGTON TN 2008272 JAN 12.
Petitioner also requested modifying the enlisted performance
evaluation report for 16 November 2009 to 20 July 2010 (copy at Tab
B) by removing reference to nonjudicial punishment.

>. ‘The Board, consisting of Messrs. Chapman, Spain and Storz,
reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on

12 June 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the
corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available
| evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of the enclosures and applicable statutes, regulations and

policies.

 

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations

within the Department of the Navy.
b. In enclosures (2) through (4), the Navy Personnel Command
offices with cognizance over the subject matter of this case have
commented to the effect that Petitioner’s request has merit and
warrants partial relief, specifically, removing documents 17002525
and 17002526.

CONCLUSION;

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of enclosures (2) through (4), the Board finds
the existence of an error and injustice warranting the following
limited corrective action.

RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing
documents 17002525 and 17002526.

b. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating
to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely
expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such entries or
material be added to the record in the future.

c. That any material directed to be removed from Petitioner's
naval record be returned to the Board, together with a copy of this
Report of Proceedings, for retention in a confidential file
maintained for such purpose, with no cross reference being made a

part of Petitioner's naval record.
d. That the remainder of Petitioner’s request be denied.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board
for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations,

Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was present at the
Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true
and complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled

matter.

Dont A Cartin

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN JONATHAN S. RUSKIN
Recorder Acting Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the

2
foregoing corrective action taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of

the Navy.

(SAD GR

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7444 13

    Original file (NR7444 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    2, The Board, consisting of Messrs. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 August 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. d. In enclosure (5), PERS-81 stated that “an advisory to the petitioner’s request cannot be completed.” e. In enclosure (6), PERS-803, the NPC office with cognizance over enlisted advancements, has commented to the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3524 13

    Original file (NR3524 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 August 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. g. In enclosure (8), MIQ commented to the effect that in light of enclosure (7), the contested BCP assignment and page 11 entries should be removed. of enclosures (5) and (8), the Board finds the existence of an error...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1666 14

    Original file (NR1666 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7o1 8S. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an error warranting the following corrective action. naval record be returned to the Board, together with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross reference being made a part of Petitioner's naval record.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3743-13

    Original file (NR3743-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Finally, by implication, he also requested removing the page 11 entry dated 3 August 2011. The Board, consisting of Ms. Lapinski and Messrs. Gorenflo and Hicks, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 13 March 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11(b) (“Administrative Remarks...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2815 14

    Original file (NR2815 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval recora be corrected by removing the fitness report for 25 February to 4 July 2011 (copy at Tab A} and the service record page 11b (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 26 May 2011 {copy at Tab B). The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Hicks and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4525 13

    Original file (NR4525 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 9 September 2011, a copy of which is at Tab A. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Boyd, Genteman and Spain, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 17 April 2014, and pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4610 14

    Original file (NR4610 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entries dated 29 June and 19 July 2011, copies of which are at Tab A. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Boyd, Genteman and Spain, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 17 April 2014, and pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 04467 12

    Original file (04467 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    As shown in enclosure (2), the Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB) has directed removing the contested fitness report. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Spain, Storz and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 17 October 2012, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing all...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2080 14

    Original file (NR2080 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the original fitness report for 31 January to 1 December 2012, together with a ietter transmitting a supplemental report for the same period, so chat the supplemental report will be the only report in the record for this period. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Chapman, Marquez and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4667 14

    Original file (NR4667 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing the NJP of 15 November 2012. b. c. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board’s recommendation be corrected, removed or completely expunged from Petitioner’s record and that no such entries or material be added to the record in the future. d. That any material directed to be removed from Petitioner's naval record be returned to the Board, together with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention in...